Control of Urban Runoff Pollution
Some of the traditional ways of controlling urban runoff are
installing storage tanks, settling tanks and retention ponds. In
order to use these methods effectively, the area that needs to be
controlled has to have the right slope, and other conditions.
Another problem with these methods is that they are not
aesthetically pleasing to many people. These methods can also get
to be very expensive to maintain. The latest in urban runoff
control is a device called Stormceptor. Stormceptor is installed
underground and collects runoff and treats it.
The Stormceptor is a simple but revolutionary patented
stormwater quality treatment device that efficiently removes oil
and suspended solids. The Stormceptor is divided into a lower
storage/separation chamber and an upper by-pass chamber.
Normal flows are diverted into the lower treatment chamber
where oil and other liquids with a specific gravity less than
water rise and become trapped and suspended solids settle to the
bottom of the chamber by gravity and centrifugal forces. During
high flow conditions, the by-pass chamber conveys water to the
downstream sewer directly circumventing the lower chamber and
preventing the resuspension and scour of settled pollutants.
Maintenance is one of the biggest issues when deciding which
control device to use. The Stormceptor was designed to be easily
monitored and cleaned from the surface without requiring entry
into the unit. Maintenance is performed from one access point by
vacuum truck.
In order to tell whether ithe Stormceptor needs to be cleaned,
an inspector will come to the site and measure the amount of
sediment in the tank. Since this can be done by just opening the
top of the Stormceptor up, and measuring with a stick, this only
takes about 20 minutes. If the Stormceptor needs to be cleaned, a
vacuum truck will come and take out all of the sediment. The time
in between each cleaning depends on where the Stormceptor is. The
cost of cleaning also varies depending on the size, but in most
cases it is cheaper and as efficient in controlling runoff as the
traditional devices.
Since the Stormceptor is a new technology, there have been many
tests done on it. One of the field monitoring tests was done in
the city of Edmonton. The city installed three Stormceptors, and
they used them to pretreat inflow into existing stormwater ponds.
During the monitoring period there was an oil spill, and the
Stormceptor captured all of the oil. The monitoring in the city
of Edmonton was bas based on flow proportional water quality
sampling at both the inlet and the outlet from the Stormceptor.
Four storms were sampled in 1996, and below are the removal
rates.
| Parameter | % Removal |
| Total Suspended Solids (TSS) | 51.5 |
| Oil and Grease (O&G) | 43.2 |
| Zinc (Zn) | 39.1 |
| Total Organic Carbon (TOC) | 31.4 |
| Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) | 26.0 |
| Lead (Pb) | 51.2 |
| Chromium (Cr) | 40.7 |
| Copper (Cu) | 21.5 |
| Iron (Fe) | 52.7 |
| Calcium (Ca) | 17.9 |
The Stormceptor is new and the maintenance is relatively
cheap. From the studies done it seems to work best as a
pretreatment before entering ponds. The company that manufactures
them hopes to improve them in the near future.
| HOME PAGE
| DEFINITION OF URBAN RUNOFF | CAUSES OF URBAN RUNOFF | ADVERSE EFFECTS OF URBAN RUNOFF | CONTROL OF URBAN RUNOFF | |