
City of Baltimore
|
Information Courtesy of:
|
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
|
All photgraphs and material used with permission.
The City of Baltimore water
utilities are capable of providing 465 million gallons of drinking water
per day for a population of 1.5 million people. The water is produced
at three conventional water treatment plants: Montebello Filtration
Plants 1 and 2
and
the Ashburton Filtration Plant. The source water originates from
the Gunpowder and Susquehana Rivers and undergoes a conventional treatment
process including chlorination, alum coagulation, sedimentation, sand filtration,
and chemical adjustment of pH and fluoride concentration. The original
Montebello Filtration Plant has been in operation since 1915 and has under
gone various modifications. The City of Baltimore is developing a
Comprehensive
Plan for Water Facilities to provide the city with direction for it's
water utilities well into the 21st century.
A pilot study was done, as a part of this plan, to identify feasible
short term and long term water treatment solutions. The study
was conducted from October 1996 through August 1997 and was broken down
into four major areas of interest:
-
TASK A: short term, low-capital improvements
that could be made to optimize the existing treatment processes, identify
"performance limiting factors"
-
TASK B: long-term improvements to improve water
quality and plant operations;
-
TASK C: direct filtration as an alternative
to conventional filtration for future expansions with spatial constraints
-
TASK D: microfiltration as a long-term alternative
to a conventional water treatment
All of these tasks were evaluated with respect to technical feasibility,
cost, public health, and other issues. This site outlines some of
the key objectives, findings and recommendations of the study.
Pilot water quality goals were established as a benchmark for
improvements in the treatment processes, maximizing the removal of particulate
and natural organic matter, and compliance with regulations. The goal for
Cryptosporidium inactivation was based on filtration and disinfection performance.
The filter productivity goals for conventional and direct filtration were
based on the relationship between Unit Filter Run Volume (UFRV, the volume
of water processed by a filter between two backwashes normalized by the
surface area of the filter). The terminal headloss for Task A was set based
on the hydraulic limitations of the current filters at the Montebello I
filtration plant. The terminal headloss for Tasks B and C was set
based on the assumption that new filters would be designed and constructed
if these processes were adopted.
|
Water
Quality Goals
|
| Turbidity |
< 0.1
NTU |
| Total Organic Carbon |
> 35 percent
removal |
| Specific
UV Absorbance (SUVA) |
< 2.0
L/mg-m |
| Total Trihalomethanes
(TTHM) |
< 80 µg/L |
| Haloacetic
Acids (HAA5) |
< 60 µg/L |
| Manganese |
< 0.05
mg/L |
| Bromate |
< 10 µg/L |
|
Operational
Goals
|
Ozonation
Cryptosporidium
inactivation |
1-log |
Filtration
Conventional UFRV
Direct Filtration UFRV
Task A Terminal Headloss
Tasks B and C Terminal Headloss |
10,000 gal/sf
5,000 gal/sf
48 inches water
96 inches water |
The work for this study was performed through pilot and bench scale
testing. The pilot tests were done in an onsite trailer
which
was plumbed into the city’s water sources. The treatment
trains in the pilot plant included conventional treatment, with the
ability to isolate each unit operation, and also membrane microfiltration.
A fly-through animation of the treatment trains in the pilot plant
is provided for ease of viewing.

Task A: Immediate Improvements
Objective 1: Determine the most appropriate doses
of alum and coagulant aids.
Findings: Through jar testing and pilot testing an alum
dose of 15 mg/L was most appropriate for all seasons. A dose of 13
mg/L is commonly used at the Montebello Filtration Plants. It was
also found that coagulant aids provided no observable benefit.
Objective 2: Identify the most appropriate filters
media design and operational parameters.
Findings: It was found that the average filter sand depth
was 14 inches at the Montebello filtration. The original filters
were designed for 20 inches of sand, but had incurred some media losses
over the years. A filter with 14 inches of Montebello I media was
pilot tested alongside a filter with 14 inches of Montebello I media
and a 6 inch cap of virgin sand. It was determined that the capped
filter never reached turbidity breakthrough after 65 hours of use at 2
gpm/sf while the uncapped filter reached a turbidity of 0.1 NTU after approximately
30 hours. Particle breakthrough of the capped filter occurred in
approximately 45 hours whereas it occurred in the uncapped filter after
15-20 hours. The backwash rates of the filters were also tested and
it was found the equipment at Montebello I and II did not achieve backwash
rates necessary to completely clean the filters.
Task B: Long Term Improvements
to Conventional Filtration
Objective 1: Evaluate alum and an alternative coagulant,
ferric chloride, with ozonation
Findings: The appropriate doses for alum and ferric chloride
were both determined to be 15 mg/L through jar testing. Tests were
then performed with each coagulant using ozone and biofiltration.
Filtered water turbidity and particle concentrations for both coagulants
were similar, but the filter runs with ferric chloride were twice as long.
The ferric chloride also provided better removal of TOC and UV-254.
Objective 2: Evaluate pre- and intermediate ozonation.
Findings: Preozonation and intermediate ozonation were
both determined to be feasible for treatment with biological filtration.
The ozone demand with ferric chloride was determined to be 0.4 mg/L as
opposed the 1.0 mg/L with alum. The ozone demand of the raw water
was 1.2 mg/L. All three of these numbers are considered low in comparison
with other raw water sources.
Objective 3: Identify the most appropriate design
of a biological filter.
Findings: A deep bed GAC-sand dual media filter should
be considered for future designs. This is due to a longer period
until particle and turbidity breakthrough, lower rate of headloss build
up, lower TOC in filtered water, and greater biological activity in comparison
to filters with an anthracite layer instead of GAC.
Task C: Direct Filtration
Objective 1: Evaluate the feasibility of direct
filtration.
Findings: Direct filtration was able to achieve turbidities
below 0.1 NTU for filter runs with UFRVs greater than 5,000 gal/sf.
The following conditions were necessary for a successful filter run:
-
Preoxidation with ozone, chlorine, or potassium permanganate
-
Alum at a dose of 3 - 5 mg/L
-
Cationic polymer at a dose of 0.5 - 1.5 mg/L
-
1-stage flocculation at G = 80 s-1 or in-line flocculation
Task D: Membrane Filtration
Objective 1: Evaluate the feasibility of microfiltration
as an alternative to conventional treatment.
Findings: The microfiltration process was determined to
be capable of meeting all the water quality goals established for this
study including a turbidity consistently below 0.1 NTU, an average SDSTHM
(Simulated Distribution System THM) concentration of 52 µg/L, and
an average SDSHAA(5) concentration of 35 µg/L.
The
microfiltration test period did not include the part of the year during
which the highest levels of DBPs were observed; however, annual averages
are still expected to be below 60 µg/L for both THMs and HAA(5).

The following recommendations are based on the results of the pilot study
and may be considered for potential changes in the water treatment operations
and processes. These recommendations are directly from the pilot
testing report submitted to the City of Baltimore by the consulting engineers.
Short term, low capital improvements (Task
A):
-
Refurbish the existing filter backwash systems at Montebello I and II and
change the setpoint at Ashburton to achieve the appropriate filter backwash
rates of approximately 25 gpm/sf.
-
Add additional media to the current filters to achieve a total media depth
of 20 inches, which will provide better water quality and improve filter
run time.
Long term improvements (Task
B):
-
Consider the following treatment train
for future plant modifications: coagulation using ferric chloride,
flocculation, sedimentation, intermediate ozonation, biological filtration
using a GAC-sand dual media filter design, and post-filtration chlorination.
Direct filtration (Task C):
-
Consider the potential benefits of using direct filtration at the Baltimore
water treatment plants.
-
Consider the following treatment train
for direct filtration: preozonation, coagulation using alum and cationic
polymer, flocculation, biological filtration, and post-filtration chlorination.
Membrane filtration (Task D):
-
Consider the potential benefits of using membrane
filtration for water treatment in the City of Baltimore.
Send comments or suggestions to:
Faculty Advisor: Daniel Gallagher, dang@vt.edu
Copyright © 1997 Daniel Gallagher
Last Modified: 2/5/1998